🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 16 hours agoAnon time travelssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square74linkfedilinkarrow-up1780arrow-down15
arrow-up1775arrow-down1imageAnon time travelssh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 16 hours agomessage-square74linkfedilink
minus-squareAlaknár@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·6 hours agoWhy? It’s objective truth - it went from 1.5% to 3%, which is a 100% increase.
minus-squaretetris11@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 minutes agoI agree, but it buries the lede of the adoption only increasing by 1.5%. They could have written “doubled from X to Y” to at least prepare our expectations that it might not be a high increment
Why? It’s objective truth - it went from 1.5% to 3%, which is a 100% increase.
I agree, but it buries the lede of the adoption only increasing by 1.5%. They could have written “doubled from X to Y” to at least prepare our expectations that it might not be a high increment