• blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If this story doesn’t convince you that birth control should be free to anyone who wants it, then you’re an idiot.

  • RalfWausE@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The essence of the story: Meeting people in person in the real world always is better than looking for someone special on some scammy dating site…

    • CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      especially considering that the dating service is interested in you looking for a partner, not actually finding one

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    18 hours ago

    30 day alcohol program is to encourage not drinking for 30 days right?

    And not to be plastered for 30 days like the name implies.

    • BigDiction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Also dating during the first stages of recovery is widely discouraged. The point is to focus on yourself and feel good about yourself, not dump all your energy and focus into a new relationship.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Pretty sure given Bacchus is over both alcohol and madness, he’s going to preside over their entire relationship. Fertility too, so they may want to be extra careful with protection.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Fortunately for them I’m pretty sure he’s just fertility as in fucking, not fertility as in reproducing. They just have to keep an eye out to stop Hera, Aphrodite, or Demeter from catching on to fhdm

          • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            fertility as in fucking, not fertility as in reproducing

            One often leads to the other, unless prevented from doing so.

  • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Okay so yes it’s green text but…

    I know people who work at inpatient acute facilities and they are constantly having to cockblock people to prevent truly horrible things from happening (think anorexia dating borderline or NPD + NPD)

    So while this particular story may not have happened, this general story happens daily.

    • starchylemming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      yeah you really really want to prevent them to have kids on accident. hell on purpose too.

      those poor kids

      one fucked up parent already fucks up a kid. imagine two

      its a place where people calm down for the first time in forever, bored and together with others in the same situation. ofc romance ensures

      • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It’s not some eugenics thing.

        People with borderline have a much higher success rate at maintaining their abusive relationship style with people who are already mentally struggling or otherwise neurodivergent.

      • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Worse yet a lot of mental health conditions have genetic components so the kids are basically getting the worst hand you can possibly deal them.

        • IronBird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          also, stress is large trigger of latent mental conditions your at risk for and guess what is incredibly stressful…living at the bottom in amerikkka

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          That’s really not well proven.

          There’s some evidence for and some against. If these two have mental conditions caused by environmental factors that they overcome they may actually provide a really good environment to a child.

        • ryannathans@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          22 hours ago

          We should get the government to put a licence on breeding so only the genetically strong can have children

            • 87Six@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I mean, genetics are genetics.

              I may have epilepsy and am strongly considering getting a vasectomy so I don’t accidentaly create a fucked up kid that can’t live normally.

              Adoption is always an option an all’at. And plenty of romance can happen without kids… Hell, ESPECIALLY without kids lol.

              • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Your personal choice is yours, and nobody can comment it. But making it a legal interdiction? That’s something else entirely. People with disabilities or illnesses can live long, happy and meaningful lives. Even more so if the society weren’t ableist.

              • Flax@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Did not expect eugenics to make a comeback in 2026 😭

                • tetris11@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  I mean, if you could screen your kid for known debillatating chronic diseases, you probably will, no?

          • edible_funk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Oops that’s eugenics! I get the sentiment but instead we should have a ridiculous amount of resources freely available to children and new parents, healthcare childcare food assistance socialization education. It takes a village and all that.

            • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Oops that’s eugenics!

              Eh, eugenics work. If not dog breeds wouldn’t exist.

              We’re just really, really bad at agreeing on what genes are good ones and attempts at filtering for good genes in humans tend to more or less immediately become about skin color because of course they do. And also it being basically impossible to do without massive human rights violations.

              But being difficult, massively immoral and unethical and usually in practice just an excuse for simple racism doesn’t mean it doesn’t work.

              • edible_funk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Eh I mostly don’t disagree, hell eliminating conditions like Huntington’s disease could qualify as eugenics so I don’t really have an issue with it in concept. Problem is if there’s a system in place for widespread eugenics some asshole is gonna use it for a genocide.

                • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  Wiping out Huntington’s would be a genocide in the most literal possible sense.

                  To be fair, if not for the whole massively immoral and unethical part, we could wipe out Huntington’s in a generation or two with mandatory testing and sterilizations. But again that whole massively immoral and unethical thing.

            • EldenLord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I mean it sounds harsh, but some people really shouldn‘t have kids. Some because of genetics (adoption is fine) and some because they are clinically insane and would destroy their children‘s psyche (these kids would be better off given up for adoption)

              In reality that‘s hard to achieve, but it is true.

              • hypnicjerk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                16 hours ago

                it’s one thing to believe in that at a high level, and another to enshrine it into law & enforce it.

                • EldenLord@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  The potential of abuse is wayyy to high to actually make laws about that.

                  It would be like saying that eating unhealthy is bad and then passing laws that may lead to someone being executed for eating a Twix.

              • edible_funk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                17 hours ago

                If childcare resources were abundant and free that would offset the problem a great deal, but capitalism and rugged individualism and all that. Like, given all the stupid out there I definitely see the appeal of it, and even things like eliminating genetic disorders would qualify so the line gets kinda fuzzy insofar as the ethics are concerned. The issue is that once systems are in place for wide scale eugenics of any flavor, some asshole will absolutely use it to genocide an ethnic group or other minority.

          • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I get your argument but the broaderidea here is that people in the psych ward aren’t generally making good decisions

          • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I say we invert it. To prevent aristicracy and nepotism, the wealthy will be prohibited from reproducting. No one in the top 10% of income or wealth gets a baby license.

            • IronBird@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              14 hours ago

              if the 2 richest people were forced to fight to death every year, imagine the rush of wealth donations there’d be every year to not be at the top

            • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              What if we just make them adopt a kid for every multiple over the 3x over the national average income. So Musk would have to have like 4 million kids. Then you heavily follow them with CPS and fine them for any infraction. Basically making CPS the biggest taxing authority.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      That tracks. I struggle to maintain boundaries and have a history of BPD folks being into me. It never goes well, and I can’t imagine a psych ward would go any differently

  • Senseless@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Can confirm. Got more actual dates with people that are legitimately interested in me from psychiatric hospitals and group therapy than online dating apps.

    • eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      A lot of people come across way better in person than via text. Also, everybody takes their best photos and puts them up so when you meet them, they always look a little different than you expected, and that’s always a moment of awkwardness. If you meet someone in person they have no priors and it can just be you. Apps can work too, but the ghosting is a constant emotional drain.

  • okwhateverdude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago
    This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you’re new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
    
    Be warned:
    
        Anon is often crazy.
        Anon is often depressed.
        Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
    
    If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
    

    No where in that does it say to write your own greentexts, screenshot them, and then post them here.