I’m not saying that all Catholics think this, but most do. also sorry if the seahorse is hard to see X—X

  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    There’s edge cases that require clarification

    Ok, yes. That’s where I believe the binary is false.

    You have red, you have blue, and then there’s a bunch of egde cases. To me that’s not the end of the story. I believe purple exists.

    • ewigkaiwelo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It is binary if you define it as a concept of reproduction, which it is. Every human that has ever been born had two parents. Looks pretty binary. Intersex people and edge cases cannot reproduce naturally, to my knowledge. So only those belonging to those two specific biological categories of sexual reproduction (males & females) can reproduce.

      • ewigkaiwelo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Also sex is defined by a pair of chromosomes, at conseption sex cells merge, each of them has only 23 chromosomes, the resulting cell has 46, which is why they say that sex is defined at conception, you can’t determine the sex at this stage without destroying the single cell (zygote), but the chromosomes will not change nevertheless

    • powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Do you have a particular edge case in mind? One that’s commonly brought up is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ovotesticular_syndrome, but that doesn’t fall outside the sex binary. Having a bit of nonfunctional tissue doesn’t affect one’s sex.

      Colors aren’t a great analogy either, because in anisogamous species, gametes are strictly binary. There’s sperm and ova, with 0 overlap and 0 other options. “Purple gametes” just don’t exist.

      This also isn’t my opinion, this is the accepted definition in the field of biology.