I’m not saying that all Catholics think this, but most do. also sorry if the seahorse is hard to see X—X

  • powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Male seahorse get pregnant, but that doesn’t make them trans, they’re unambiguously male. This is a great example of why sex is defined by gamete size. If it weren’t, we couldn’t talk about males and females in any useful way across the animal kingdom.

    Clownfish would be a better example as they’re sequential hermaphrodites, but that doesn’t have any bearing on the human sex binary.

      • powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        This is often a point of confusion, but human sex is binary. There’s edge cases that require clarification as to how they fit into the binary, but don’t disprove it.

        Human sexuality overall is complex and that’s why we differentiate gender from sex. The sex binary and gender spectrum complement each other though, and don’t clash.

        If you’re interested in learning more, here’s some background reading:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonochorism

        We fall into that category, where we have two body plans, each organized around producing either sperm or ova. Other species have more body plans, such as recognizably distinct males, females, and hermaphrodites:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trioecy

        Those species are a good contrast. Humans don’t have that variation, and so sex is binary in humans.

        There’s literature that explains this specifically in detail, though most of it doesn’t really explicitly talk about it, much like math papers don’t generally explain that integers can be added together.

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          34 minutes ago

          There’s edge cases that require clarification

          Ok, yes. That’s where I believe the binary is false.

          You have red, you have blue, and then there’s a bunch of egde cases. To me that’s not the end of the story. I believe purple exists.

    • zout@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      How about chickens? If you have some hens without a rooster, you’ve got good chance that one of them will “transform” into a rooster. Especially if you had a rooster but it died.

      • powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’m not aware of that being an actual change in sex. The hen can develop male characteristics, but won’t produce functional sperm.

          • powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I think we agree. Maybe I was misreading the above comment, but I was just clarifying that “transform” in that sense for chickens is not actually changing sex, and so is a different situation than clownfish.

  • the_q@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I feel like this misrepresents what trans means, but I’m not educated enough to get into it.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s perfectly cis for a male seahorse to give birth. That said, a quick search told me they also change sexes over the course of their life so…

      • the_q@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        But I was under the impression that part of transitioning was the conscious decision to make a change in line with self perception. I can’t help but think non human animals wouldn’t experience that.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Ah, yeah we can’t really know. Sequential hermaphrodism in chordates however is sometimes used to argue that biological sex isn’t as stable of a construct as some prefer to act like it is, in a similar way to how intersex people are used to express how it isn’t as binary of a concept as culture would have you believe.

          • village604@adultswim.fan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I’m not sure you can really apply the biology of sea horses to humans, though.

            Like, just because some reptiles can regenerate tails doesn’t mean humans regenerating limbs is natural.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Fair, but you also have to keep in mind that this isn’t any of the rigorous argumentation. This is symbols and discussions with grandma level argumentation.

              • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                I have had some success with it. Doubt the guy changed his views, but he stopped using that argument.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    also sorry if the seahorse is hard to see

    I am emotionally damaged and triggered from seeing this seahorse. It was a very hard thing for me to see.

  • In case you wanted the explanation from a 1993 Nirvana T-shirt: “Ever the trendsetter, the sea horse is the sole animal known to man which the male of the species endures the privilege of childbirth. Following a length courtship, a male and female have intercourse during which the female enters the male and lays as many as 200 eggs which are fertilized within the body of the male. After a 5-week gestation period, the male gives birth.”

  • Shrubbery@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Catholics: Eating your young isn’t normal or part of nature.

    Nature: Looks like meat is back on the menu, boys!

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Chill? They’re the more rigorous side for certain but chill feels like an exaggeration. That said, I’m ex catholic and have complicated feelings about them.

      • cattywampas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Catholic dogma may be relatively strict, I’m not sure, I haven’t extensively studied other sects of Christianity. But Catholic people are, in my experience, pretty chill. If anything they’re a much more “love the sinner, hate the sin” kind of bunch. It’s the evangelicals you gotta watch out for.

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Episcopalians, which is basically Catholicism-lite, are even more chill. They were the first to allow gay people to be reverends.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That’s generally true, except for the overwhelming violence sometimes. Also there’s the thing with fascists converting to catholicism in America.

          In a different form of Catholics having no fucking chill, is the aesthetics and relationship to suffering. Catholicism has a religious fetishization of suffering, which can produce really cool art from The Locked Tomb books (some of the major plot points include specifically catholic dogma) to the gilded human remains, as well as producing some weirder stuff like the play Sancta Susana, religious autoflagelation, and just so very many billable hours for therapists relating to guilt.